For IQAC teams at colleges & universities
Your NAAC accreditation, organised from day one.
Give every metric an owner, collect responses and documents from faculty, and watch each of the seven criteria move towards ready, all in one portal built for your IQAC.
- criteria
- 7
- metrics tracked
- 36
- roles
- 3
The NAAC cycle
Ready at every stage
The same data, collected once, carries you from the yearly AQAR to the peer team visit.
- 1
Every year
AQAR
A fresh set of metrics each academic year, filled in as the year runs.
- 2
Each cycle
SSR
Criterion-wise responses and evidence, reviewed and approved by IQAC.
- 3
After submission
DVV
Every metric’s documents in one place when clarifications are asked.
- 4
On campus
Peer team visit
Walk the team through each criterion with nothing left to find.
The seven criteria
Organised the way NAAC assesses you
Pick a criterion to see what it covers and the metrics your IQAC tracks in the portal.
Criterion 2
Teaching-Learning and Evaluation
350
points of 1000
Admissions, teaching methods, faculty quality, evaluation and student outcomes. The heaviest criterion.
- 2.1.1Enrolment percentage against sanctioned seatsQnM
- 2.2.1Assessment of learning levels and programmes for slow and advanced learnersQlM
- 2.3.1Student-centric methods: experiential, participative and problem-solving learningQlM
- 2.4.1Full-time teachers against sanctioned postsQnM
- 2.4.2Full-time teachers with a Ph.D. / NET / SET / SLETQnM
- 2.5.1Transparent and robust internal assessment mechanismQlM
- 2.6.1Programme and course outcomes stated and communicatedQlM
- 2.6.3Pass percentage of final-year studentsQnM
- 2.7.1Student Satisfaction Survey (SSS)QnM
How it works
From assignment to approval in three steps
Give every metric the right owner
Add faculty by department, then hand each metric to the person who knows it best. Nothing is left unassigned.
- Add teachers in seconds, each with their own login
- Assign or reassign any metric
- See unassigned metrics at a glance
Write the response, attach the proof
Teachers see only their metrics. They write the response, upload PDFs, photos and spreadsheets, and submit when ready.
- PDF, images, Word, Excel and PowerPoint
- Drafts save as you go
- IQAC comments right on the metric
Review, comment, approve
Every submission comes to IQAC. Approve it, or send it back with a note on what to fix. Approved metrics lock.
- One review queue for the institute
- Send back with a comment
- Every action on the activity log
For the IQAC
One dashboard for the whole institution
Know where every criterion stands before the IQAC meeting starts, not after it ends.
Criterion readiness
Approved, in review, drafting and not started for all seven.
Faculty-wise progress
Who owns what, and how much each person has had approved.
Evidence documents
Files stored per metric, viewable only by the right people.
Review with comments
Approve or send back, with the reason right on the metric.
Activity log
Every assignment, upload and review, with who and when.
Private to your institute
Role-based access and sessions that can be revoked instantly.
Who signs in
Three roles, one institution
MyLeading Campus
Sets up your institute and IQAC login, and supports you through the cycle.
IQAC coordinator
Adds faculty, assigns metrics, reviews submissions and tracks readiness.
Faculty
Fills the metrics assigned to them and responds to IQAC comments.
Each person sees only what their role needs. Institutes never see each other’s data.
Yes. Data is organised by the seven criteria and their metrics, with qualitative (QlM) and quantitative (QnM) metrics marked, so it maps straight onto your SSR and AQAR.
Start your next NAAC cycle months ahead, not weeks.
See how your IQAC team would run SSR and AQAR data collection in a short demo.
Book a demo